Archive for the ‘blogs’ Category

“Surprise Me. (Fun Mode)”

Monday, April 19th, 2010

The New Museum hosted Seven on Seven this weekend (April 17/18, 2010) – where seven artists and seven technologists paired up to create social media based art and present their ideas to a paying crowd at the museum. Here’s the NYTimes review. Mark Mullenweg, a creator of WordPress, and the artist Evan Roth, collaborated to produce Surprise Me. (Fun Mode) which offers WordPress bloggers some positive reinforcement every time they hit the Publish button. “They described it as ‘an emotional plug-in’, a virtual artwork to celebrate the ‘sacred act of publishing,’ which the web has transformed as fundamentally as Gutenberg did and which is in turn, transforming society.”

Eager to try it, I was going to install it but it’s only available for blogs  hosted on WordPress. If your blog is there, try it and please let me know what you saw.

Blogs About Art Finally Get Some Respect!

Sunday, January 31st, 2010

Blogs offer serious journalism, breaking news, diversity of views and opportunities to connect directly with readers. Not all blogs, of course, and it hasn’t always been this way. For years people have criticized bloggers, claiming that they’re just a bunch of opinionators, not trustworthy sources of information – no one vets their facts or holds them to standards of journalistic practice.

I recently moderated Blog This!, a panel discussion whose purpose was to review how the role of blogging in the art world, by institutions, individuals, and entrepreneurs, has evolved over the past few years and whether it’s finally time to give art bloggers some respect!

Moderator Robin White and Panelists: Kelly Shindler, Paddy Johnson, Barry Hoggard, William Powhida, Ed Winkleman. Video thanks to James Kalm.

Our panelists were chosen because their blogs are well known in the art world, and because they represent a cross section of types. As my museum readers know, even institutional blogs have had to work hard to develop a community of readers and commenters. On the internet it’s not easy to gain the trust of an audience. 

Panelists 

Barry Hoggard, who runs the Culture Pundit network and the calendar ArtCat,

Paddy Johnson, publisher, editor and writer of Artfagcity,

William Powhida/williampowhida.com, artist

Kelly Shindler/ founder of the art21 blog (part of the PBS series on twentyfirst century art, Art21;

Edward Winkleman/edwinkleman.blogspot.com, art dealer

This line up had 130 people glued to their seats at X Initiative in Chelsea on January 15th, listening to their favorite bloggers answer questions about their blogging goals, roles, ethics, and efforts to keep things cordial when comments get out of hand.

The panel was sponsored by ArtTable, organized by Heather Darcy Bandhari of Mixed Greens, Lauren Pearson of Art Cycle, and myself.

We asked panelists these questions:

When so many newspapers and magazines are going out of business, or at least cutting back on reviews and criticism, can blogs honorably take up the slack in publishing art journalism and criticism and spread the word about new artists?

Are they trustworthy sources of information? What kind of ethical standards do they have? 

How do they fit with other social media services like Facebook and Twitter?

I’ll try to summarize the panelists’ most salient comments.

In response to questions about the trustworthiness of personal blogs vs branded print journalism:

-       Ed said – while the purpose of his blog is basically to promote his gallery, if he disrespects his readers (and those are the ones that matter because they are the only people paying attention to you) they’re stop reading.  Essentially, your readers keep you honest.

-       Barry pointed out that the role of the press should be to question people in power as well as to report on events; when a lot of print and TV journalists in this country don’t ask hard questions you could say they call into question their own ethics; some bloggers have taken up the role of asking hard questions – in the art world and about the news in general

-       Since serious writers and critics are migrating to the web, all the panelists agreed that galleries should include blog reviews on artists’ biographies

-       Kelly said that on the art21 blog, which focuses on presenting the artist’s voice, they had some issues with whether artists should write about their own work.

 

In response to questions about commenters and developing community:

-       Ed said “if you hit too hard at somebody they never come back so if you’re interested in changing someone’s opinion do it over a series of comments;

-       Paddy and Kelly agreed that there’s a lot of self-policing among community of commenters – they start to take care of themselves;

-       Kelly pointed out that a little debate strengthens the community

-       Still, all of the panelists moderate their comments now, to keep the conversations relatively focused and civil.

 

In response to the question of how blogs, facebook and twitter work together:

-       Paddy said different audiences prefer different tools so a blogger who posts to all three places will be talking to a wider group of people than simply those who read and comment on the blog itself

-       Paddy also said these are great ways “to break up the echo chamber of the blogosphere”

-       Kelly and William Powhida concurred saying that Twitter and Facebook are a useful interface for promoting the blog and developing other conversations

In response to a question about how to develop a successful blog:

-       Ed pointed out that Blogs are measured by traffic – one way to get more readers is to link to other blogs;

-       Ed said  – find your voice – it’s what makes your blog unique

-       I said – write about what you’re passionate about = strong content

-       Paddy added – update frequently

-       “The central currency on a blog is generosity,” in Ed’s words, “the more generous you are the more comes back to you.” He blogged about the panel, expanding on these topics before and after the panel.

 

After the panel Jerry Saltz, art critic for New York Magazine, wrote  “Excellent panel at ‘X’ last nite on Facebook. His comment that “younger critics should just say what they like/don’t like about works of art,” generated 138 comments and developed into a lively conversation about blogs, journalism, the state of art criticism, whether it’s a conflict of interest or not to accept gallery advertising on a blog about art, and who people’s favorite art writers.

And artist and videographer Jim Kalm wrote “I’ve always loved the whimsical freewheeling give and take of the blogosphere … creating a virtual Exquisite Corpse.”   He also posted two videos of the panel discussion for you to check out.

So I would say that blogs, for all their flaws, make a significant contribution to the cultural, intellectual and political conversations that inform our choices and actions every day.  Bloggers, keep on bloggin’!

Posted via email from mediacombo’s posterous

Best Practices for Blogging

Monday, April 13th, 2009

I recently prepared a set of recommendations for the Brooklyn Historical Society’s bloggers, who have quietly been growing their blog since July 2008. They knew they needed clear guidance on how to set goals, undertake the work and measure their success. I’ve uploaded the Best Practices document, so feel free to download it and use it to support your own efforts. If you have any additions or recommendations, please share them.

An Interview with Kevin von Appen

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

The Ontario Science Center’s Kevin von Appen talked to me about the Center’s two year old experiment with web video, and its commitment to the YouTube community in particular, when we met at Museums and the Web Conference last spring. Kevin is the Director of Daily Experience Operations at OSC.

Even then he was excited about the big event that’s taking place this Friday, August 8th, at OSC, the 8.8.8. Toronto Meet Up.

RW: How long ago did you start putting videos on the web?

KVA: We started in October 2006 with video experiments on YouTube and other sites. We were watching the emergence of YouTube as a channel for dialogue and communication through the summer of 2006. Smart people were saying this is an area for experimentation. Lots of people didn’t have the skills to shoot and edit video but we did, fortunately. You don’t need to be an expert – you can do in-camera edits. If you have an interesting event, just set up the camera, that’s enough.

RW: Like you did with the astronaut describing how a toilet works in the absence of gravity in space. That was both scientifically accurate and hilarious. It’s been viewed on YouTube over 1,000,000 times!

 picture of Space Toilet video on YouTube

KVA: That’s a good example of what I’m talking about – he was a good storyteller and we just clipped the best two minutes of his presentation. It wasn’t a technological masterpiece, but it was a communications success.

RW: How does the look of these videos affect the impression people have of the Science Center?

KVA: The question of how it makes you look is a big one. For OSC the informal look of the videos works. We’ve talked a lot about what’s the voice of the Science Center. I define it as a humorous friend who knows just a bit more than you do and is really excited to tell you. Friends tell the truth, they don’t talk down to other friends, they’re respectful; they have a sense of humor.

RW: Do you mean that sometimes it’s easier for people to hear difficult things if they’re touched with humor?

KVA: You know, when people talk about serious things that are exciting to them, that matter to them, they always find opportunities to crack a joke – out of a sense of joy; it comes out of the love of what they’re doing. They don’t need to be pompous. We’re always looking for that informal voice. On the floor we have human faces – the Hosts – and online videos in social spaces are like that – offering a chance to provide a personal face.

RW: Could you elaborate on this?

KVA: The exchanges VideoChick770 has with other YouTubers are what are meaningful. She captures content in various ways and puts it up there. It covers the interesting people who come to talk, the exhibitions, our demonstrations.

RW: When I perused the videos I came away with the impression that the Ontario Science Center is a place where all kinds of people with all kinds of interests can have a good time.

KVA: For me the exchange is key. These are places for conversation, not for broadcast. That’s why we’re looking forward to the Meet Up. Word spreads through connections VideoChick770 has made. I’m most interested in the conversations, where we, the institution, are listening respectfully – to comments about the videos and in videos that are posted in response to ours. True interactions are driven by visitors on the web and on the floor. We don’t tell people what to think.

OSC's videochick770

RW: How would you characterize these exchanges? What are you looking for in these conversations?

KVA: How would I characterize them? Take the astronaut video. There were well over 1, 000,000 downloads and thousands of responses. If you scroll through them you’ll see lots of stuff – “lol” messages as if they were instant messages, or bathroom humor but also there are thoughtful pieces of exchange. For example someone wrote in “I didn”t know Canada had a space program.” That opens the door to talk about international space programs besides NASA. But you should look for yourself and make your own judgement.

Theodore Sturgeon, the science fiction writer had his own law: “ninety percent of science fiction is crud, but then ninety percent of everything is garbage.”

RW: I know what you mean!

KVA: You can”t control this stuff. We’re watching everything unfold, and we’re as much affected by what happens as we are influencing what happens. For one thing, in the web space to download and watch a video is more of a commitment than clicking on a banner ad. At a fundamental level, online video is a medium for getting people to engage with science. Participation, co-creation and dialogue – these are the things we encourage at the Science Center and things can happen using social media regardless of geography. YouTube social media is a natural way to engage visitors in new ways.

RW: Do you see different types of responses at the different video sites?

KVA: That’s a very good question. We have our videos on 19 different places: YouTube, Yahoo, Break.com, spike.tv, blip.tv, etc. Our content is the same on all of them. The responses on break.com are a bit more “frat boy” but the vast majority of our traffic comes from Yahoo and YouTube. Yahoo likes us – they often feature our stuff because it’s slightly quirky, family friendly in a good way, interesting, easily accessible, not intimidating. Also – the provenance of the content is important; they feel safe assuming the content must be solid when they see the OSC logo at the end, meaning it came from a trusted source.

RW: I think the fact that you put the logo at the end is very significant. This way you’re not prejudicing the audience – scaring them away by announcing that they’re about to watch science content. This way they’ve already kind of bought into the content and where it comes from isn’t really important to them.

KVA: With YouTube if you just make the videos and put them up there it’s a little like throwing a cup of water in a river. What makes a difference is dialoguing with other people, supporting them by commenting on their videos, tagging them. VideoChick770 has spent a lot of time interacting with the YouTube community. She’s identified the opinion leaders within the community. How do you get yourself noticed? You have to participate.

We’re genuinely curious about the responses. We’re trying to listen – don’t open the door if there’s nothing on the other side. Commitment to active participation is crucial. That’s why the “persona” of the Museum is so important.

RW: What do you mean by “persona”?

KWA: Organizations right now see the web as the responsibility of web teams, if they have them. You don’t need a web team to build things these days, you just need to tell your story and find the best people to tell it. The new priority setting is to know who/how to tell the story. Some conversations I’ve had with people tell me that this point is not so obvious.

We’re not just a place, we’re a presence. There’s a physical place and a virtual place. There’s what people are saying about us in social media, and what we’re putting out there in social media – these things make us a presence. It’s not about how we get more people to come to the website, it’s more how do we become a presence on the web.

RW: How do you decide which programs or activities will be part of your web presence?

KVA: We see this whole thing as an experiment. In considering what experiments we’ve done we ask:

How does this line up with our mission?

What are we already doing that is like this?

We ask what’s a good fit for us?

Podcasts are a good example. We’ve been answering questions for decades, and podcasts are expanded answers and they allow for a conversation. In the Westin Family Innovation Centre people can create their own stop motion videos on the floor, so it’s a natural expansion to upload them to share. With Facebook, it’s what would make it an opportunity for true community different from our corporate website? We’re still figuring it out.

RW: How to have an impact that is different from but complements the main museum web site.

KVA: It’s also question of resources – what you’re going to do to have impact. We have a pretty small web team so we put our energies into things that support what we’re already doing, or are organic extensions of those things. There are lots of things I’d like to explore – mashups, flickr, I think Brooklyn Museum of Art is an exemplar in this area.

The penny dropped for me when my daughter who was 9 at the time, was asking if she could watch YouTube more than TV. You’re a 9 year old girl interested in funny cats. You can wait nine months for Discovery Channel or you can go on YouTube right away.

There’s a zeitgeist around these activities. It doesn’t take long for interesting videos to zip around and be shared by friends.

RW: You’ve had a few viral videos.

KVA: The majority of our downloads are driven by a few videos that capture interest and go viral. If we do a Hot Spot presentation on a really busy day at OSC there may be 200 people on the floor and some of them are walking in and out of the presentation. When we put a video of that event on our YouTube channel, over time you are exponentially increasing your audience. 200 people may watch on the floor, but 1,000 people will download the video. Is the interaction the same? Of course not, but I would argue that the commitment is greater – as long as the video is brief.

RW: Yes, most of your videos are under 3:00, many are under 2:00….So what’s surprised you the most?

KVA: I’ve been surprised about everything. When we went on all we knew was that it was an interesting medium to explore. We’ve been surprised by how fast things have been picked up, by the quality of comments, by the videos people have made in response – even the parodies, because people have to listen closely to make a good parody.

RW: What’s the idea behind the 888 Toronto Meet Up* that’s happening at OSC on Friday August 8th?

KVA: What I was really interested in as a science museum communicator, was how does this loop back to the experience in the Museum? The idea that you develop relationships with people and invite them to come to the Museum, and they really are coming from all over the world. People who love videos and science will come together to make videos about science that we would never think of making. That’s where the mission of the organization and the potential of the social web really come together. I’m interested in that.

 OSC website Meet Up page

RW: So, you’re not worried being able to control for appropriateness, correctness, respect for the subjects?

KVA: You’ve got to be willing to give up control, to embrace the messiness, embrace the crash when it doesn’t work. By and large OSC is committed to these modes of visitor interaction. I feel supported by the organization. The questions that come up are real and should be grappled with, because otherwise vivid imaginations will come up with all sorts of potential horror stories and we won’t even be able to try things out. It’s handy to call things “experiments” because we can see what happens. For the most part our audiences don’t let us down. It doesn’t mean we give up on expertise but it does mean we give up our notion and position of broadcaster at a podium – “here’s my message now listen.”

The Meet up is a way to track transference from web space to physical space. It will be a very clear response to the question of how do you know this investment of resources will lead to business?

RW: What’s interesting is how the role of the science center in web space differs from its traditional role in physical space, how the role of the science center is changing because of the internet.

KVA: Let’s face it, these days science centers are not about transmitting facts, so what’s our value? Giving people the tools and inspiration to navigate it themselves, and maybe create it. We need to be communicators first – we can’t be all about facts. Facts are cheap but the ability to “cope” – evaluate, have primary experiences – that’s our goal.

* As the OSC website says, “Following the success of YouTube’s 777 meetup (July 7, 2007) in New York City, the Science Centre is hosting the “888torontomeetup,” Canada’s first large-scale YouTube community gathering.” Of course people are invited to bring their cameras, and bite.tv will be televising the proceedings. So far more than 700 YouTubers have rsvp’d!

The event has been organized by Kathy Nicholiachuk , known to YouTubers as videochick770. She is the face of the Center on YouTube, the engine behind the community that has developed on the OSC channel.

Museums and Visitors: Interacting on the Web and in the Galleries – Part 2: Using Blogs

Monday, February 18th, 2008

This is Part 2 of a five part conversation with Holly Sidford. Please see the Archives to access the other parts.

Holly: There’s a real tension between scholarship and entertainment. Scholars should not necessarily be expected to be entertainers and vice versa. But museums are public institutions and if they want to make a claim on public money and philanthropic money (which, given the tax advantages of philanthropic giving, in a sense is another form of public money) and attract visitors, then they must pay attention to what visitors are attracted by, what’s interesting to them.

Visitor Voices, published by ASTC

Robin: Here’s a very interesting example of such thinking. I was reading about an experiment organized by The Cantor Art Center at Stanford, in a new book called Visitor Voices edited by Kathy McClean and Wendy Pollock. In 2004 The Cantor opened “Question,” a presentation whose purpose was to address questions from visitors such as: Who decides what is art or who is an artist? Where is the meaning in a work of art? This looks like my kid could do it so why is it hanging in a museum? They put it all out there for ten months letting visitors know that no question was inappropriate, making people feel comfortable in that space of not knowing, and there were lots of opportunities for them to enter into conversations with staff and docents. Visitors really got into the spirit of the show, and follow up studies showed that it has deeply affected the way the staff collaborates and incorporate learning goals into exhibitions.

Holly: Why does the way objects are displayed and the experience of moving through an exhibition have to be so staid and formal? Break it up, cut it up, have more fun. It may not guarantee that younger visitors will come, but without such incentives, they are likely to give museums a pass. There are just too many juicy alternatives.

Giving people a chance to participate and have a dialogue makes it juicier, without eliminating scholarship.

Robin: Actually we suggested an early version of this to the Newark Museum back in 2000 for their web site, when we were producing the multimedia components for their American Art Galleries. We wanted to set up a place on their site where visitors could email questions to the curator, who would respond on a weekly basis.

Now there are over 250 museum blogs where directors, curators, staff and visitors have dialogues about objects, exhibitions, best practices – you name it.

Holly: It’s really about how genuinely a museum wants to engage an audience — any kind of audience but particularly a new audience. One of the great examples for me – it’s almost 20 years old but it’s still a model for how to engage a new audience – is Kathy Halbreich’s work with teenagers at The Walker Art Center. When Kathy first got to the Walker, very few teenagers were connected to the museum in any way, which is too bad because it’s a museum about contemporary culture. Kathy and her staff convened a committee that represented “24 hours in the life of a teenager”: the school superintendent, people who ran youth clubs, the coaches from the local sports teams, people from Dayton Hudson department store. She tried to get people who interact with teenagers in a variety of ways to sit down and talk about how the museum could be more meaningful to them. She got a lot of ideas but one of the most important was: Talk to the kids themselves!

Walker Art Museum's teen website

So the Walker composed an advisory committee of teenagers. The teens visited every department in the museum; staff talked to them about what was interesting and what would be appealing to their peers. Together the kids and the museum staff designed an array of programs that have since blossomed, including employing teenagers in various departments, strategies for engaging teens in shows and activities, and developing marketing plans that consider teen audiences. The point is they took the time to learn about this “new” audience and then developed programs and offerings of authentic interest to them. The museum has maintained their conversation with the kids over time and the result is increased attendance and real credibility with a new and enthusiastic demographic.

Robin: In fact the Walker has just launched a new version of their teen website; one half, the business side, is for museum educators and other grownups, describing The Walker’s current teen programs. The play side of the site is composed entirely of blogs generated and produced by WACTAC, the Walker Art Center Teen Art Council. They blog about music, art, films and events both Walker related and not, and post their art works and interviews – it’s a museum-sponsored site for and by teens. Since this age group is comfortable with blogging and social networking, it’s an appropriate technology for attracting teen participants.

SFMOMA's Olafur Eliasson exhibition web page

And speaking of museum blogs, here’s a daring example from SFMOMA. For their current retrospective of Olafur Eliasson, they’ve created a blog on the exhibition website itself, where visitors can directly post their comments about the show. In essence visitors become guides who share their collective experience of the work. SFMOMA is allowing visitors to critique the exhibition, to contribute interpretations, optimize the experience for others and consequently, engage a wider audience. Our conversation continues in Part 3: Using Podcasting, Part 4: Using FaceBook and Part 5: Sharing Content.