Archive for the ‘sharing’ Category

Some Highlights from #nytmuseums Twitter Chat

Thursday, March 17th, 2011

Participants in today’s hour long #nytmuseum twitter chat were pelted with tweets full of questions and great answers.  It all happened so fast that human minds and the twitter server couldn’t keep up in real time.

So I favorited as many of the tweets as I could to review later. Since @hypoallergic posted a summary of highlights here I thought I’d add my notes to create a fuller picture of the event.

Highlights from #nytmuseums twitter chat:

How can we integrate gameplay to engage visitors and prospective visitors (PerfectPlum)

Q In what ways has info/content gathered from sm made its way into the web/mobile content offered by your museum? Sandy Goldberg

Social media networks should be looked at as “relationship builders” rather than just an extension of a sales team (anthonybrown)

A combination of voices representing a museum of different social media channels is good, but consistency is the key (Rob Stein and Shelly Bernstein).

Retweeting different staffers through the main museum feed may be an answer (Museumnerd)

In response to a question about what content visitors share on social media:

We are finding the behind the scenes experience to be very valuable (AMNH)

Show us your visit as you see it! (Shelly Bernstein)

Q: Does your museum have a collections object/specimen as your SM rep? Like Mr. Blobby, or SuetheRex  http://tinyurl.com/328qtwq (Future of Museums)

@MovingimageNYC has exhibits where patrons can create something and share on Social Media.

Q How can museums best reward social “ambassadors” through shares, retweets? (henry art gallery)

Work to bring the visitor voice inside the institution at every turn (Shelly Bernstein)

Perhaps a behind-the-scenes trip/pass for opening (Jessica Faye Carter)

That’s a great idea! To invite tweeters to come to press previews! (Anulfo)

Q What would you like to see from Museums on line? Insight into exhibition decision making processes (Loni Rocchio)

Q How are your museums using social media to enrich content?

Facebook ads have delivered more response than Google adwords. (various)

I found facebook ads easier to use than google adwords. I think the target is easier to set and cost is WAY easier to manage. (Museum Secrets)

Big thread about the meaning of metrics:

Tynt is an often overlooked tool which tracks copies and pastes…we love it. Free too! www.tynt.com (The Warhol Museum)

The links we tweet from @SFMOMA are now #2 source of website treffic after Google search. Which is insane. (@origful)

Good article about Klout, metrics, etc: adage.com/u/u97KBb (@chelwhita)

Q about the use of QR codes:

QR codes optimize an effect of serendipity, discovery and surprise…powerful emotional/memory/stimulants (Len Steinbach)

Look to @mattressfactory for QR implementation that rocks (Shelly Bernstein)

Did anyone see what the Virginia Museum of Fine Art did with QR codes? Amazing! http://www.facebook.com/#!/myVMFA (Kimbell Art Museum)

In response to a tweet about an 80 yr old visitor scanning QR codes with her iPad in the gallery:

iPads do seem to be changing the game. Several of our board members have them (Brooklyn Historical Society)

I’ve always loved the idea of putting a sign w/a specific hastage by a piece in Museum & then collecting/displaying those tweets (Julie Brubaker)

Q from Rob Stein: you all agreed that its key to combo numbers and user feedback to determine overall impact?

Q5 How do your social media channels communicate w/each other? Twitter/FB.Flickr/etc (@MetEveryday)

I think the different outlets often have different constituents (museumnerd)

Our twitter followers are younger/biz-related, our FB followers tend to be moms and dads. We tailor content differently. (Children’s Museum, NH)

Important to also share different content on different platforms-keeps the convo interesting (Dia Art Foundation)

I agree that museums should lose the idea that museum content only belongs on their own site. (Rob Stein, Shelly Bernstein)

Q What is the ratio of people engaging w/ SM before, during & afeer museum/art visit? (Nancy Proctor)

Have you looked at @storify http://storify.com? It won an #sxswi competition this week. (from CCA wire)

Then by all means check out the full chat – link is in the first sentence above.

Google Art Project

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

Last week Google announced Google Art Project, an extraordinary website where Google has adapted their Streetview technology for indoors and used it to map some of the galleries in 17 of the world’s major museums, among them:

The Museum of Modern Art, Tate Britain, Uffizi Gallery, Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Rijksmuseum.

Within their galleries, you can peruse the walls and zoom in to look quite closely at the paintings. In addition to paintings scanned at ordinary hi-res, Google provided gigapixel scans of one painting for each museum; these allow you to zoom in to see the painting surface at a scale that the artists themselves may not have had in real life.

Each painting becomes a universe you enter and experience on an ever more abstract, mind-bending level the closer in you go. You have to see it to understand the experience. It’s like the Hubble Telescope focused on paintings instead of the heavens!

Some people have criticized the project because the navigation isn’t perfect – you can often end up in the street outside a museum as you’re trying to get from one gallery to another. Other criticisms include the fact that only some artworks are available to view while others are blurred out, and only 17 museums have signed up for this Project so far. You the user are stuck with the choices Google and the museums have made for you.

These things are true but I think they miss the point. What we as viewers have been given is an opportunity to see these artworks in a way you’ve never seen before, and that will change your whole relationship with them.

You can get to know these artworks intimately, becoming aware of every brushstroke and bread crumb, every curl of spray from a wave, every strand of hair, tiny bud, spec of dung, wispy cloud, every starry halo. And gradually you absorb the relationship of each detail to those around it and begin to build an impression of the painting from the inside out until you own it.

You can take as much time as you like, any time and place you choose, as long as there’s wi-fi or 3G. Imagine how this can change your experience of a work of art when finally you see it in real life.

The painter Ed Ruscha once described to me how he had been fascinated by Jasper Johns’ work when he first saw it reproduced in Artforum Magazine. But when he finally saw it in real life it was like a bomb went off in his head.

Whether it’s a bomb that explodes, or just a sharp intake of breath as you see the real thing, your bond with the art, and probably the institution, will be strong and personal, before you walk in the door.

Oh, and you can make your own collection of works, and even collect your own views of each work to return to, like your favorite piece of music. You can share these galleries too if you want.

If there is one thing I’d like to see it’s a way to know when I’m looking at the life size artwork – at the size the artist was working on; and when I’m looking at the image in hi-res, how much more closely am I able to see than he/she was.

Use BklynMuse!

Monday, March 29th, 2010

I think this is a very exciting time for museums who are willing to be experimental. Yesterday I whiled away an hour in the Brooklyn Museum‘s galleries, trying out a new version of BklynMuse, to access their online collection, on their newly upgraded mobile website.

Here’s how it works: once you’ve joined their public wi-fi network, you stand in front of an object, type in its number on your phone and, presto! you can pull up the image, “like” it, a la Facebook, leave your own comment, see other visitors’ comments and learn more about it from experts.

You can also play Gallery Tag, where you collect points for every item you tag, and extra points for doing this on more than one floor.

I wanted to try out BklynMuse  because I was curious to see how disruptive the social media activity would be to my experience. Normally when I go to a museum it’s to see a specific show, or just wander with a friend through the galleries. I couldn’t really imagine wanting to interact on my phone.

There’s a piece that I’ve always loved in the Arts of the Pacific Islands gallery, so I went there first. Here he is, a little figure from the Nicobar Islands.

To me he looks like kind of a crazy, happy guy, and maybe he’s surfing.

I typed in his number and, to my surprise, this is where it got to be fun. Thanks to BklynMuse I saw right away that five other people have also “liked” the Nicobar Island man so I know I’m not the only one. I happily left a comment, and am eager to see what future visitors think of him,  and how that might give me fresh ways of looking at him.

I tried the tagging game too, and racked up 25 points, which put me in 3rd place! BklynMuse just launched this week so very few people are using it yet. Gallery Tag reminded me of a home made version of FourSquare.

What’s unique about BklynMuse is that it’s entirely visitor driven. It’s not a tour or guide to the collection designed by Brooklyn Museum. It’s a vehicle for visitors who are motivated to feed their curiosity about particular artworks; it encourages them to voice their reactions to the works, and validates what they have to say by publishing their comments.

Tagging too can have its serious purpose; even as a kid just playing a game, you have to look at the object you’ve chosen, look at the tags that are offered, think about which is most appropriate, and if there isn’t one, create a new one to use. It’s empowering in its way!

We’ve been members of the Brooklyn Museum since we moved here from Manhattan 20 years ago. I took my son to more Arty Facts sessions than I can recall. In 1997 I produced a big, beautiful 24 screen video wall program for the exhibition Monet and the Mediterranean, in their old, cavernous lobby. That was large cutting edge technology for its day, and the Museum used it to make the space more friendly for visitors waiting on line to see the show.

Today they’re carrying on that tradition of being out in front in using technology, with imaginative, experimental efforts in social media and mobile,  to make the Museum friendly to new audiences. As a visitor I really feel that they’re trying to give me a wonderful experience and I’m willing to try it. In the process, I learn from them and they learn from me.

#WhiBi: The Twitter Tour of the Whitney Biennial

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

Today I participated remotely in the Twitter Tour of the Whitney Biennial, organized by @Whitney, @WNYCculture and @cmosntah (Caroline Miranda), and led by Biennial curator Gary Carrion-Murayari. Eight winners of a contest were invited to go on the tour through the galleries and tweet about it. A bunch of us followed the tweeters, got to ask questions, add comments and participate in a strange but enjoyable experience.

What was it like? The fun part was performing an unscripted conversation about the Biennial in real time with smart people I didn’t necessarily know. We came together and formed an ad hoc little community for the event (an event community) to eagerly share and receive words from the curator, reactions to the art, and pictures. Even though there were two distinct groups – those who were at the Whitney, and those who were not, it didn’t feel hierarchical.

As remote participants we only received a small fraction of the story due to the limitations designed into Twitter. There were plenty of tweets that arrived out of chronological order, partly due to dead spots in the Museum, and partly to the differences in people’s phones, so the flow wasn’t smooth. But no one expected a typical museum tour. In fact, I’m not sure any of us knew what to expect. That was part of the excitement. I was on auto-pilot for a few minutes when I had my ear buds in, as if expecting there to be Twitter audio. I guess that’s next!

Would I do this again? Probably. Did I have fun and converse with some very interesting people? Yes!

You can follow all the comments and see all the pictures at #WhiBi. You’ll be surprised how much you find out!

Going Mobile @Balboa Park

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

The amount of content available for smart phones has skyrocketed during the last year. Consider these statistics:

-       Apple’s App Store had over 140,000 apps and users had downloaded apps over 3 billion times by late 2009.

-       AT&T’s had 85.1 million wireless subscribers at the end of 2009

-       Verizon ended 2009 with 87.5 million wireless subscribers

-       Forrester estimated that 3 million eReaders were sold in 2009 and predicts that 10 million e-readers will be sold in the coming year.*

The trend is only growing stronger, so it makes sense for museums and content providers of every stripe to consider going mobile.

On February 17, Nancy Proctor, Head of New Media at the Smithsonian Museum of American Art and manager of museummobile.info, and Titus Bicknell, internet technologist, spoke at the two day workshop “Going Mobil @ Balboa Park,” where they offered a terrific overview of the things museums need to consider before developing mobile content.

There’s a fine report of the event and video interviews with Nancy and Titus at experienceology.blogspot.com. Nancy’s slide show is available here and Titus’ slides are here.

Nancy makes a lovely comparison when she says that the Museum used to be like the Acropolis, and is now becoming more like the Agora. I hope there will always be visitors who seek a  more meditative experience at museums, but many  will find the opportunity to share ideas and interests with each other and with curators in real time very appealing.

A mobile presentation supports both types. When you’re engaged with content on your own phone it’s easy to shut out the world and focus. Just look at all the subway riders on their morning commute. Yet built in social media links add the potential to share the application’s content with friends, and your thoughts with the museum.

By the way, I just searched the iPhone app store for “museum,” and 180 apps appeared. There are probably some that shouldn’t really be there but still, it’s an impressive number!

Best Practices for Blogging

Monday, April 13th, 2009

I recently prepared a set of recommendations for the Brooklyn Historical Society’s bloggers, who have quietly been growing their blog since July 2008. They knew they needed clear guidance on how to set goals, undertake the work and measure their success. I’ve uploaded the Best Practices document, so feel free to download it and use it to support your own efforts. If you have any additions or recommendations, please share them.

An Interview with Kevin von Appen

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

The Ontario Science Center’s Kevin von Appen talked to me about the Center’s two year old experiment with web video, and its commitment to the YouTube community in particular, when we met at Museums and the Web Conference last spring. Kevin is the Director of Daily Experience Operations at OSC.

Even then he was excited about the big event that’s taking place this Friday, August 8th, at OSC, the 8.8.8. Toronto Meet Up.

RW: How long ago did you start putting videos on the web?

KVA: We started in October 2006 with video experiments on YouTube and other sites. We were watching the emergence of YouTube as a channel for dialogue and communication through the summer of 2006. Smart people were saying this is an area for experimentation. Lots of people didn’t have the skills to shoot and edit video but we did, fortunately. You don’t need to be an expert – you can do in-camera edits. If you have an interesting event, just set up the camera, that’s enough.

RW: Like you did with the astronaut describing how a toilet works in the absence of gravity in space. That was both scientifically accurate and hilarious. It’s been viewed on YouTube over 1,000,000 times!

 picture of Space Toilet video on YouTube

KVA: That’s a good example of what I’m talking about – he was a good storyteller and we just clipped the best two minutes of his presentation. It wasn’t a technological masterpiece, but it was a communications success.

RW: How does the look of these videos affect the impression people have of the Science Center?

KVA: The question of how it makes you look is a big one. For OSC the informal look of the videos works. We’ve talked a lot about what’s the voice of the Science Center. I define it as a humorous friend who knows just a bit more than you do and is really excited to tell you. Friends tell the truth, they don’t talk down to other friends, they’re respectful; they have a sense of humor.

RW: Do you mean that sometimes it’s easier for people to hear difficult things if they’re touched with humor?

KVA: You know, when people talk about serious things that are exciting to them, that matter to them, they always find opportunities to crack a joke – out of a sense of joy; it comes out of the love of what they’re doing. They don’t need to be pompous. We’re always looking for that informal voice. On the floor we have human faces – the Hosts – and online videos in social spaces are like that – offering a chance to provide a personal face.

RW: Could you elaborate on this?

KVA: The exchanges VideoChick770 has with other YouTubers are what are meaningful. She captures content in various ways and puts it up there. It covers the interesting people who come to talk, the exhibitions, our demonstrations.

RW: When I perused the videos I came away with the impression that the Ontario Science Center is a place where all kinds of people with all kinds of interests can have a good time.

KVA: For me the exchange is key. These are places for conversation, not for broadcast. That’s why we’re looking forward to the Meet Up. Word spreads through connections VideoChick770 has made. I’m most interested in the conversations, where we, the institution, are listening respectfully – to comments about the videos and in videos that are posted in response to ours. True interactions are driven by visitors on the web and on the floor. We don’t tell people what to think.

OSC's videochick770

RW: How would you characterize these exchanges? What are you looking for in these conversations?

KVA: How would I characterize them? Take the astronaut video. There were well over 1, 000,000 downloads and thousands of responses. If you scroll through them you’ll see lots of stuff – “lol” messages as if they were instant messages, or bathroom humor but also there are thoughtful pieces of exchange. For example someone wrote in “I didn”t know Canada had a space program.” That opens the door to talk about international space programs besides NASA. But you should look for yourself and make your own judgement.

Theodore Sturgeon, the science fiction writer had his own law: “ninety percent of science fiction is crud, but then ninety percent of everything is garbage.”

RW: I know what you mean!

KVA: You can”t control this stuff. We’re watching everything unfold, and we’re as much affected by what happens as we are influencing what happens. For one thing, in the web space to download and watch a video is more of a commitment than clicking on a banner ad. At a fundamental level, online video is a medium for getting people to engage with science. Participation, co-creation and dialogue – these are the things we encourage at the Science Center and things can happen using social media regardless of geography. YouTube social media is a natural way to engage visitors in new ways.

RW: Do you see different types of responses at the different video sites?

KVA: That’s a very good question. We have our videos on 19 different places: YouTube, Yahoo, Break.com, spike.tv, blip.tv, etc. Our content is the same on all of them. The responses on break.com are a bit more “frat boy” but the vast majority of our traffic comes from Yahoo and YouTube. Yahoo likes us – they often feature our stuff because it’s slightly quirky, family friendly in a good way, interesting, easily accessible, not intimidating. Also – the provenance of the content is important; they feel safe assuming the content must be solid when they see the OSC logo at the end, meaning it came from a trusted source.

RW: I think the fact that you put the logo at the end is very significant. This way you’re not prejudicing the audience – scaring them away by announcing that they’re about to watch science content. This way they’ve already kind of bought into the content and where it comes from isn’t really important to them.

KVA: With YouTube if you just make the videos and put them up there it’s a little like throwing a cup of water in a river. What makes a difference is dialoguing with other people, supporting them by commenting on their videos, tagging them. VideoChick770 has spent a lot of time interacting with the YouTube community. She’s identified the opinion leaders within the community. How do you get yourself noticed? You have to participate.

We’re genuinely curious about the responses. We’re trying to listen – don’t open the door if there’s nothing on the other side. Commitment to active participation is crucial. That’s why the “persona” of the Museum is so important.

RW: What do you mean by “persona”?

KWA: Organizations right now see the web as the responsibility of web teams, if they have them. You don’t need a web team to build things these days, you just need to tell your story and find the best people to tell it. The new priority setting is to know who/how to tell the story. Some conversations I’ve had with people tell me that this point is not so obvious.

We’re not just a place, we’re a presence. There’s a physical place and a virtual place. There’s what people are saying about us in social media, and what we’re putting out there in social media – these things make us a presence. It’s not about how we get more people to come to the website, it’s more how do we become a presence on the web.

RW: How do you decide which programs or activities will be part of your web presence?

KVA: We see this whole thing as an experiment. In considering what experiments we’ve done we ask:

How does this line up with our mission?

What are we already doing that is like this?

We ask what’s a good fit for us?

Podcasts are a good example. We’ve been answering questions for decades, and podcasts are expanded answers and they allow for a conversation. In the Westin Family Innovation Centre people can create their own stop motion videos on the floor, so it’s a natural expansion to upload them to share. With Facebook, it’s what would make it an opportunity for true community different from our corporate website? We’re still figuring it out.

RW: How to have an impact that is different from but complements the main museum web site.

KVA: It’s also question of resources – what you’re going to do to have impact. We have a pretty small web team so we put our energies into things that support what we’re already doing, or are organic extensions of those things. There are lots of things I’d like to explore – mashups, flickr, I think Brooklyn Museum of Art is an exemplar in this area.

The penny dropped for me when my daughter who was 9 at the time, was asking if she could watch YouTube more than TV. You’re a 9 year old girl interested in funny cats. You can wait nine months for Discovery Channel or you can go on YouTube right away.

There’s a zeitgeist around these activities. It doesn’t take long for interesting videos to zip around and be shared by friends.

RW: You’ve had a few viral videos.

KVA: The majority of our downloads are driven by a few videos that capture interest and go viral. If we do a Hot Spot presentation on a really busy day at OSC there may be 200 people on the floor and some of them are walking in and out of the presentation. When we put a video of that event on our YouTube channel, over time you are exponentially increasing your audience. 200 people may watch on the floor, but 1,000 people will download the video. Is the interaction the same? Of course not, but I would argue that the commitment is greater – as long as the video is brief.

RW: Yes, most of your videos are under 3:00, many are under 2:00….So what’s surprised you the most?

KVA: I’ve been surprised about everything. When we went on all we knew was that it was an interesting medium to explore. We’ve been surprised by how fast things have been picked up, by the quality of comments, by the videos people have made in response – even the parodies, because people have to listen closely to make a good parody.

RW: What’s the idea behind the 888 Toronto Meet Up* that’s happening at OSC on Friday August 8th?

KVA: What I was really interested in as a science museum communicator, was how does this loop back to the experience in the Museum? The idea that you develop relationships with people and invite them to come to the Museum, and they really are coming from all over the world. People who love videos and science will come together to make videos about science that we would never think of making. That’s where the mission of the organization and the potential of the social web really come together. I’m interested in that.

 OSC website Meet Up page

RW: So, you’re not worried being able to control for appropriateness, correctness, respect for the subjects?

KVA: You’ve got to be willing to give up control, to embrace the messiness, embrace the crash when it doesn’t work. By and large OSC is committed to these modes of visitor interaction. I feel supported by the organization. The questions that come up are real and should be grappled with, because otherwise vivid imaginations will come up with all sorts of potential horror stories and we won’t even be able to try things out. It’s handy to call things “experiments” because we can see what happens. For the most part our audiences don’t let us down. It doesn’t mean we give up on expertise but it does mean we give up our notion and position of broadcaster at a podium – “here’s my message now listen.”

The Meet up is a way to track transference from web space to physical space. It will be a very clear response to the question of how do you know this investment of resources will lead to business?

RW: What’s interesting is how the role of the science center in web space differs from its traditional role in physical space, how the role of the science center is changing because of the internet.

KVA: Let’s face it, these days science centers are not about transmitting facts, so what’s our value? Giving people the tools and inspiration to navigate it themselves, and maybe create it. We need to be communicators first – we can’t be all about facts. Facts are cheap but the ability to “cope” – evaluate, have primary experiences – that’s our goal.

* As the OSC website says, “Following the success of YouTube’s 777 meetup (July 7, 2007) in New York City, the Science Centre is hosting the “888torontomeetup,” Canada’s first large-scale YouTube community gathering.” Of course people are invited to bring their cameras, and bite.tv will be televising the proceedings. So far more than 700 YouTubers have rsvp’d!

The event has been organized by Kathy Nicholiachuk , known to YouTubers as videochick770. She is the face of the Center on YouTube, the engine behind the community that has developed on the OSC channel.