Archive for the ‘Youtube’ Category

An Interview with Kevin von Appen

Wednesday, August 6th, 2008

The Ontario Science Center’s Kevin von Appen talked to me about the Center’s two year old experiment with web video, and its commitment to the YouTube community in particular, when we met at Museums and the Web Conference last spring. Kevin is the Director of Daily Experience Operations at OSC.

Even then he was excited about the big event that’s taking place this Friday, August 8th, at OSC, the 8.8.8. Toronto Meet Up.

RW: How long ago did you start putting videos on the web?

KVA: We started in October 2006 with video experiments on YouTube and other sites. We were watching the emergence of YouTube as a channel for dialogue and communication through the summer of 2006. Smart people were saying this is an area for experimentation. Lots of people didn’t have the skills to shoot and edit video but we did, fortunately. You don’t need to be an expert – you can do in-camera edits. If you have an interesting event, just set up the camera, that’s enough.

RW: Like you did with the astronaut describing how a toilet works in the absence of gravity in space. That was both scientifically accurate and hilarious. It’s been viewed on YouTube over 1,000,000 times!

 picture of Space Toilet video on YouTube

KVA: That’s a good example of what I’m talking about – he was a good storyteller and we just clipped the best two minutes of his presentation. It wasn’t a technological masterpiece, but it was a communications success.

RW: How does the look of these videos affect the impression people have of the Science Center?

KVA: The question of how it makes you look is a big one. For OSC the informal look of the videos works. We’ve talked a lot about what’s the voice of the Science Center. I define it as a humorous friend who knows just a bit more than you do and is really excited to tell you. Friends tell the truth, they don’t talk down to other friends, they’re respectful; they have a sense of humor.

RW: Do you mean that sometimes it’s easier for people to hear difficult things if they’re touched with humor?

KVA: You know, when people talk about serious things that are exciting to them, that matter to them, they always find opportunities to crack a joke – out of a sense of joy; it comes out of the love of what they’re doing. They don’t need to be pompous. We’re always looking for that informal voice. On the floor we have human faces – the Hosts – and online videos in social spaces are like that – offering a chance to provide a personal face.

RW: Could you elaborate on this?

KVA: The exchanges VideoChick770 has with other YouTubers are what are meaningful. She captures content in various ways and puts it up there. It covers the interesting people who come to talk, the exhibitions, our demonstrations.

RW: When I perused the videos I came away with the impression that the Ontario Science Center is a place where all kinds of people with all kinds of interests can have a good time.

KVA: For me the exchange is key. These are places for conversation, not for broadcast. That’s why we’re looking forward to the Meet Up. Word spreads through connections VideoChick770 has made. I’m most interested in the conversations, where we, the institution, are listening respectfully – to comments about the videos and in videos that are posted in response to ours. True interactions are driven by visitors on the web and on the floor. We don’t tell people what to think.

OSC's videochick770

RW: How would you characterize these exchanges? What are you looking for in these conversations?

KVA: How would I characterize them? Take the astronaut video. There were well over 1, 000,000 downloads and thousands of responses. If you scroll through them you’ll see lots of stuff – “lol” messages as if they were instant messages, or bathroom humor but also there are thoughtful pieces of exchange. For example someone wrote in “I didn”t know Canada had a space program.” That opens the door to talk about international space programs besides NASA. But you should look for yourself and make your own judgement.

Theodore Sturgeon, the science fiction writer had his own law: “ninety percent of science fiction is crud, but then ninety percent of everything is garbage.”

RW: I know what you mean!

KVA: You can”t control this stuff. We’re watching everything unfold, and we’re as much affected by what happens as we are influencing what happens. For one thing, in the web space to download and watch a video is more of a commitment than clicking on a banner ad. At a fundamental level, online video is a medium for getting people to engage with science. Participation, co-creation and dialogue – these are the things we encourage at the Science Center and things can happen using social media regardless of geography. YouTube social media is a natural way to engage visitors in new ways.

RW: Do you see different types of responses at the different video sites?

KVA: That’s a very good question. We have our videos on 19 different places: YouTube, Yahoo, Break.com, spike.tv, blip.tv, etc. Our content is the same on all of them. The responses on break.com are a bit more “frat boy” but the vast majority of our traffic comes from Yahoo and YouTube. Yahoo likes us – they often feature our stuff because it’s slightly quirky, family friendly in a good way, interesting, easily accessible, not intimidating. Also – the provenance of the content is important; they feel safe assuming the content must be solid when they see the OSC logo at the end, meaning it came from a trusted source.

RW: I think the fact that you put the logo at the end is very significant. This way you’re not prejudicing the audience – scaring them away by announcing that they’re about to watch science content. This way they’ve already kind of bought into the content and where it comes from isn’t really important to them.

KVA: With YouTube if you just make the videos and put them up there it’s a little like throwing a cup of water in a river. What makes a difference is dialoguing with other people, supporting them by commenting on their videos, tagging them. VideoChick770 has spent a lot of time interacting with the YouTube community. She’s identified the opinion leaders within the community. How do you get yourself noticed? You have to participate.

We’re genuinely curious about the responses. We’re trying to listen – don’t open the door if there’s nothing on the other side. Commitment to active participation is crucial. That’s why the “persona” of the Museum is so important.

RW: What do you mean by “persona”?

KWA: Organizations right now see the web as the responsibility of web teams, if they have them. You don’t need a web team to build things these days, you just need to tell your story and find the best people to tell it. The new priority setting is to know who/how to tell the story. Some conversations I’ve had with people tell me that this point is not so obvious.

We’re not just a place, we’re a presence. There’s a physical place and a virtual place. There’s what people are saying about us in social media, and what we’re putting out there in social media – these things make us a presence. It’s not about how we get more people to come to the website, it’s more how do we become a presence on the web.

RW: How do you decide which programs or activities will be part of your web presence?

KVA: We see this whole thing as an experiment. In considering what experiments we’ve done we ask:

How does this line up with our mission?

What are we already doing that is like this?

We ask what’s a good fit for us?

Podcasts are a good example. We’ve been answering questions for decades, and podcasts are expanded answers and they allow for a conversation. In the Westin Family Innovation Centre people can create their own stop motion videos on the floor, so it’s a natural expansion to upload them to share. With Facebook, it’s what would make it an opportunity for true community different from our corporate website? We’re still figuring it out.

RW: How to have an impact that is different from but complements the main museum web site.

KVA: It’s also question of resources – what you’re going to do to have impact. We have a pretty small web team so we put our energies into things that support what we’re already doing, or are organic extensions of those things. There are lots of things I’d like to explore – mashups, flickr, I think Brooklyn Museum of Art is an exemplar in this area.

The penny dropped for me when my daughter who was 9 at the time, was asking if she could watch YouTube more than TV. You’re a 9 year old girl interested in funny cats. You can wait nine months for Discovery Channel or you can go on YouTube right away.

There’s a zeitgeist around these activities. It doesn’t take long for interesting videos to zip around and be shared by friends.

RW: You’ve had a few viral videos.

KVA: The majority of our downloads are driven by a few videos that capture interest and go viral. If we do a Hot Spot presentation on a really busy day at OSC there may be 200 people on the floor and some of them are walking in and out of the presentation. When we put a video of that event on our YouTube channel, over time you are exponentially increasing your audience. 200 people may watch on the floor, but 1,000 people will download the video. Is the interaction the same? Of course not, but I would argue that the commitment is greater – as long as the video is brief.

RW: Yes, most of your videos are under 3:00, many are under 2:00….So what’s surprised you the most?

KVA: I’ve been surprised about everything. When we went on all we knew was that it was an interesting medium to explore. We’ve been surprised by how fast things have been picked up, by the quality of comments, by the videos people have made in response – even the parodies, because people have to listen closely to make a good parody.

RW: What’s the idea behind the 888 Toronto Meet Up* that’s happening at OSC on Friday August 8th?

KVA: What I was really interested in as a science museum communicator, was how does this loop back to the experience in the Museum? The idea that you develop relationships with people and invite them to come to the Museum, and they really are coming from all over the world. People who love videos and science will come together to make videos about science that we would never think of making. That’s where the mission of the organization and the potential of the social web really come together. I’m interested in that.

 OSC website Meet Up page

RW: So, you’re not worried being able to control for appropriateness, correctness, respect for the subjects?

KVA: You’ve got to be willing to give up control, to embrace the messiness, embrace the crash when it doesn’t work. By and large OSC is committed to these modes of visitor interaction. I feel supported by the organization. The questions that come up are real and should be grappled with, because otherwise vivid imaginations will come up with all sorts of potential horror stories and we won’t even be able to try things out. It’s handy to call things “experiments” because we can see what happens. For the most part our audiences don’t let us down. It doesn’t mean we give up on expertise but it does mean we give up our notion and position of broadcaster at a podium – “here’s my message now listen.”

The Meet up is a way to track transference from web space to physical space. It will be a very clear response to the question of how do you know this investment of resources will lead to business?

RW: What’s interesting is how the role of the science center in web space differs from its traditional role in physical space, how the role of the science center is changing because of the internet.

KVA: Let’s face it, these days science centers are not about transmitting facts, so what’s our value? Giving people the tools and inspiration to navigate it themselves, and maybe create it. We need to be communicators first – we can’t be all about facts. Facts are cheap but the ability to “cope” – evaluate, have primary experiences – that’s our goal.

* As the OSC website says, “Following the success of YouTube’s 777 meetup (July 7, 2007) in New York City, the Science Centre is hosting the “888torontomeetup,” Canada’s first large-scale YouTube community gathering.” Of course people are invited to bring their cameras, and bite.tv will be televising the proceedings. So far more than 700 YouTubers have rsvp’d!

The event has been organized by Kathy Nicholiachuk , known to YouTubers as videochick770. She is the face of the Center on YouTube, the engine behind the community that has developed on the OSC channel.

AAM Video Podcast Tutorial

Sunday, June 22nd, 2008

At this year’s AAM conference I gave a tutorial on how to produce a video podcast. There were two identical sessions, and at each session, one of the 30 participants won a new FlipCam! This is a great little video camera that fits in the palm of your hand and costs $100.00. You can’t really go wrong.

 

If you’re interested in a quick and easy way to get started producing your own podcasts, you can download the handout here. Please let me know how it works out. I’d be happy to do a workshop at your museum. If you decide you need something more polished to present on your website or for iTunes U, I can help you produce those too.

Museums and the Web 2008 Conference – YouTube

Monday, June 9th, 2008

More About YouTube

Museums are starting their own channels on YouTube in ever greater numbers. At this session presenters from The Exploratorium, San Jose Museum of Art, the Hirshhorn Museum, MoMA, and the Indianapolis Museum of Art shared their goals, frustrations and insights about operating a channel on YouTube.

The subjects of the videos on the Exploratorium’s channel expand the definition of “science” to incorporate things you might not normally think of. For example, live web cam videos where you can watch scientists in the Antartic getting suited up to go out to work. It takes a while! Or you can watch visitors to the Museum respond to an invitation to drink water out of a toilet, in Mind, a new exhibition where you get to explore how your own mind works.

Exploratorium on YouTube

They have staff curated playlists on their channel, and are training teen docents to shoot their videos. Nicole Minor, presenting for the Exploratorium, made an important observation based on their experience: building a social network on your channel is a real challenge. Yet building that community around your content is the goal, it’s the reason to be on YouTube – so your museum can reach out to and nurture a new audience who are interested in your content. YouTube offers your museum a different way of presenting itself to people, of enlarging its “persona” on the web, showing a new side of itself. The network grows in response to the effort you make to find interested people and engage them in “conversation,” as The Indianapolis Museum of Art learned.

IMA accidentally found success on YouTube by producing “how to videos” targeted to small but dedicated audiences interested in origami and calligraphy. As Dan Dark said, they had to get over the fact that people were not looking for the IMA brand; they were looking for content that mattered to them. Instructional videos are popular, easy to produce, and easy to promote by linking to subject blogs and participating in subject based community forums. Dan understood that IMA needed to participate as a member of the YouTube community so he looked for similar videos on other channels, used the same tags, and engaged in a dialogue with others interested in these subjects. Their origami videos have been viewed several thousand times.They feature Dr. Robert J. Lang, a physicist and engineer with a passion for origami, who has used this expertise to design the way airbags are folded to deploy immediately when needed, and to enable expandable space telescopes, among other amazing things!

IMA on YouTube

IMA’s videos feature Lang creating origami ducks, swallows and scorpions, but you can begin to see the kind of connections that are possible. IMA has also posted other types of videos of course, and you can watch them all here.

David Hart at MoMA picked up the community theme when describing the situation of MoMA’s channel. It’s very time consuming to moderate comments, at least half of which are spam. Occasionally they see negative comments, but there are some really great ones too. Is it worth all the trouble? How do you evaluate the success of your channel? Is it number of views? Probably not since, as David stated, the farting panda video will definitely get more views than our videos will, even the artist Doug Aitkin’s, which had over 100,000 views.

But two people who watched Aitkin’s video on MoMA’s channel were inspired to produce and upload response videos, and there are more than 75 comments, some in response to the video and some in response to other peoples’ comments. I got the impression that the people who made most of the comments were familiar with Aitkin’s work already, and love it or hate it and wanted to let MoMA know how they felt. This channel has become a place for people to speak to the Museum and to each other. You can see how the next step is for MoMA to respond to the commenters and begin to have to a real conversation.

While I was at MW2008 I interviewed Kevin von Appen, Associate Director of Daily Operations at the Ontario Science Center, about their web video strategy, and in particular their YouTube channel. Kevin and OSC have been active in this area since October 2006. He’s a firm believer in the potential and value of the conversations that are possible, and has some wonderful insights and useful advice for how to think about representing your museum using video on the web. That interview will appear here in the next few weeks.

Museums and Visitors: Interacting on the Web and in the Galleries – Part 1: Using YouTube

Thursday, February 14th, 2008

Recently I had a conversation with Holly Sidford, President of Helicon Collaborative, a cultural development company.* Holly and I are, to use Salman Rushdie’s term, “museum brats,” growing up near the Mint Museum and The Metropolitan Museum of Art respectively. We are both very interested in how new technologies have begun to impact cultural institutions, as they try to sustain and expand audiences. Our conversation ranged over a number of themes, including the benefits of using web 2.0 applications.

Brooklyn Museum, courtesy National Archives

Robin: The traditional experience of going to a museum was kind of a silent, private affair where you went to appreciate the artworks or objects, mostly because you were already interested in them. You didn’t need to be convinced of their value or meaning. But that way of thinking has really lost currency in the last decade. These days it seems visitors want to be engaged rather than left to contemplate, and they expect museums to support their particular interests – with audio-video tours, computer interactives and opportunities to share their thoughts.

Holly: It seems to me the vast majority of visitors to museums are sampling, they’re after pleasurable experiences. More and more, people come to museums with expectations shaped by their experience in commercial venues so they expect things to be highly mediated, tailored to their individual interests; they expect things to be very fast moving and stimulating. They expect their opinions to be valued – or at least they expect to be able to share their opinions at some point in their visit.

Robin: They expect a lot more from museums than they used to!

Holly: A good example of this is the video talk-back program that was part of the New York Historical Society’s exhibit, Slavery and New York. The exhibit designers, Richard Rabinowitz and Lynda Kaplan, made it possible for people who attended to share their thoughts about the show, and about slavery itself, about race and racism and other issues, on video – to talk back to the museum and reflect on their experiences. Thousands of people took advantage of that invitation. That’s just one demonstration of people’s hunger to have their own opinions validated and to have some sort of interaction with the material on the wall.

New-York Historical Society Talk Back video on Youtube

Robin: And not only were the video talkbacks available at the Historical Society, they were also posted to YouTube for everybody to see! This is a really good example of using social networking media – YouTube – to link the museum and its exhibition to a broader audience. Most of those clips on YouTube received fewer than 100 views but one of the shorter ones has over 1,000 views. The Historical Society’s new exhibition on the Marquis De Lafayette, by the same curators, continues with video talk-backs so they are demonstrating their commitment to hearing from visitors. In the process N-YHS wlll learn a lot about what their visitors think, and if they continue to post them to YouTube, they’ll carve a niche for themselves with a larger audience and attract new visitors to their galleries. YouTube and other video sharing services will be the focus of another report coming soon.

It seems like a win-win situation, but many institutions don’t see it that way. They’re reluctant to give visitors a chance to voice their opinions. Perhaps they don’t really want to know what visitors think; perhaps they’re afraid to yield some of the power they have to control the exhibition narrative and define the meaning of the objects. It’s understandable, but how can museum staff overcome that resistance? How do curators keep the scholarship bar high, while making visitors feel engaged and respected? The conversation continues in Part 2: Using Blogs, Part 3: Using Podcasts, Part 4: Using FaceBook, and Part 5: Sharing Content.